Posts tagged Andrew Leipold
Is Mass Incarceration Inevitable? Part 3. What About Violent Crime?

“Reducing the national incarceration rate is a test of our political will. Keeping a lot fewer people behind bars might well lead to an uptick in crime, especially if we release more inmates without paying for the support they need for successful reintegration once they are released (more on this in the next post). And the reform efforts to date suggest that our commitment to reducing the prison population may not be matched by our willingness to take the risks necessary to make it happen. This can been seen most clearly in our treatment of those who commit violent crimes.“

Reason Magazine

October 9, 2019

Read More
Is Mass Incarceration Inevitable? Part 1. What's the Problem?

“But while the recent decline in prison populations is real, there are also reasons to wonder.  Given the size of the U.S. inmate population and the extremely high rate at which we put people behind bars, will any reform efforts be enough to shed the "mass incarceration" label? Over the next few posts I will be discussing this question, and (to cut to the chase) conclude that the answer is, sadly, no.  There are both obvious and subtle barriers to reducing the inmate population to levels, ones that range from difficult to near-impossible to overcome.“

Reason Magazine

October 7, 2019

Read More
Will Fear of Crime Dampen Support for Ending Mass Incarceration?

“Although there’s widespread consensus among experts that spending time in prison “might be exacerbating the crime problem rather than easing it,” few authorities at the state or federal levels appear willing to risk the political problems that might accompany transformative change, argued Andrew W. Leipold, Edwin M. Adams Professor at the University of Illinois College of Law, in a recent article in the American Criminal Law Review. That, he suggested, should make us skeptical about the expectations raised by the reformers’ rhetoric.“

The Crime Report

August 23, 2019

Read More